This isn't a database you search. It's three agents that read on your behalf — one watches the week's filings and your book, one rides along with your account, one works an owner's name across the public record.
They do the reading a person doesn't have time for. You make the calls that matter. All three follow the same rule: they show their work, and they never conclude for you.
Hand it a name off a pooling order and it works the public record the way a landman would — several searches at once, obituaries and probate dockets and grave records read in full, the living heirs surfaced even when the surname changed across two generations.
It reads your pipeline and the page you're on. Ask it what to work first, where your best leads are, or what's gone quiet — it answers from your actual book, not a manual.
It watches the week's filings and your own pipeline and tells you what moved — money growing into an account nobody claimed, fresh pooling landing on a county where you're already owed, a lead going cold. The Monday email is its voice.
A single search, asked to find an heir, will happily guess. So the research agent runs the same question several different ways and treats the answers as votes, not facts. A name only counts when more than one search lands on it — and even then it stays a candidate for you to confirm.
An agent that reads records about other people's property has to be the careful kind. Ours carry a source for every claim, cap their own confidence, and hand the decision back to you. That discipline is written down, rule by rule, on the trust page.
How the rules are enforced →